Skip to main content

Recognizing the causes of rolling element bearing failures

Assuming proper design, application, and lubrication, rolling element bearings will fail sooner or later due to their natural material fatigue life limit, but all bearings will fail prematurely from abuse or neglect.

BY L. (TEX) LEUGNER

Troubleshooting of rolling element bearing problems and recognizing their root cause of failure is often difficult, because many failure types look very similar. This is because bearing failures are almost always precipitated by spalling or flaking conditions of the bearing component surfaces. Spalling occurs when a bearing has reached its fatigue life limit, but also when premature failures occur. For this reason, it is important for the troubleshooter to be aware of and able to recognize all the common failures of rolling element bearings. This ability to correctly troubleshoot and recognize the root cause of bearing failures will lead the analyst to the right conclusions. We often hear the comment, even by knowledgeable and well-meaning engineers and technicians, “this bearing failed prematurely because it was defective.” Manufacturing defects in rolling element bearings make up less than one percent of the millions of bearings in use today around the world and this small defect percentage is being reduced continually by improvements in manufacturing techniques and bearing materials. Only a small fraction of all the bearings in use fail because they have reached their material fatigue limit. Most bearings outlive the machinery or component in which they are installed.

Q| Does the maintenance group understand what constitutes bearing fatigue life limits?

LOGIC: rolling element bearing life expectancy is directly related to the number of revolutions performed by the bearing, the magnitude of the load and the lubrication and cleanliness of the lubricant; assuming correct initial bearing selection and proper installation. Fatigue is the result of shear stresses, referred to as elastic deformation, cyclically appearing immediately below the load-carrying surface, as the rollers or balls pass over the raceway.

After many revolutions, these stresses between the rolling element and raceway surfaces will cause subsurface cracks to appear that will gradually extend to the surface of the rolling element, raceway, or both. These cracks may cause surface fragments of bearing material to break away. This condition is referred to as flaking or spalling that continues until the bearing has reached its life limit as illustrated below.


Q| Can the failure investigator explain the cause of the bearing failure illustrated below?

LOGIC: the frosted or smeared appearance of this bearing race illustrates what happens when the oil viscosity is too low (thin), and metal-to-metal contact occurs. This type of premature failure often occurs during initial start-up of heavily loaded bearings. This damage occurred after only 15 seconds of operation.

Q| Can the failure investigator recognize and explain the cause of the bearing failure illustrated below?

LOGIC: this bearing has failed due to continual welding contact between asperities on the metal surfaces, eventually causing metal to be ‘pulled out’ as the surfaces adhered to each other during rotation. This condition may have been caused by oil of the wrong viscosity, excessive load, speed, temperature, incorrect internal clearances, trapped contaminants or a combination of these conditions.

Even an increase of as little as 4° or 5° in temperature may contribute to these failures, due to unacceptable thinning of the lubricant’s viscosity. When analyzing the root cause of a failure, all the possible contributing causes must be considered.

Q| Can the failure analyst recognize and explain the cause of the two bearing failures illustrated below?

LOGIC: the rusting and white colouration on the outer race of the first bearing show a combination of several possible conditions; including small vibrations causing oscillation of the outer race, reddish discolouration of moisture in the bearing caused by poor sealing, poor fits between the outer raceway and housing, lack of lubrication or improper installation. The second bearing shows serious dark corrosion on the inner raceway equidistant between the rolling elements that occurred while the bearing was stationary.

Q| Can the failure analyst recognize and describe the bearing failure illustrated below?

LOGIC: over lubrication is frequently the cause of grease lubricated bearing failure causing higher than normal bearing operating temperatures. Excessive grease quantities cause internal friction within the lubricant, which in turn promotes excessive temperatures causing oxidation and premature lubricant and bearing failure.

Excessive quantities of grease cause a churning action within the rotating components and the result will always be an increase in temperature. Oil of too high viscosity or grease with a too high consistency will also increase operating temperatures. Care must be taken when investigating high temperatures, that the troubleshooter must consider not only the possibility of excessive lubricant, but that the correct lubricant for the application is in use.

Q| Can the failure analyst explain the cause of the bearing failure illustrated below?

LOGIC: bearings are not safe from potential electrostatic discharge or stray currents generated by electromagnetic forces. In these bearing applications, it is recommended that the bearing be grounded using grounding brushes.

For users of fan and electric motor belts and conveyors, the industry standards that define minimum conductivity are RMA IP-3-3, ISO 1813, and ISO 9563. In addition, drive belt manufacturers recommend the use of static conductive belts of six megohms or less. This bearing’s inner ring shows clear evidence of corrugated surface damage caused by electric pitting.

The challenge for troubleshooters is to learn to recognize the difference between the tiny percent of bearings that display material fatigue spalling that confirms their end of life and most bearings that display premature failures described above, because in many instances they look like the untrained eye.

It should come as no surprise to experienced equipment troubleshooters that assuming proper design, application, and lubrication, rolling element bearings will fail sooner or later due to their natural material fatigue life limit, but all bearings will fail prematurely from abuse or neglect.

L. (Tex) Leugner, author of Practical Handbook of Machinery Lubrication, is a 15-year veteran of the Royal Canadian Electrical Mechanical Engineers, where he served as a technical specialist. He was the founder and operations manager of Maintenance Technology International Inc. for 30 years. Tex holds an STLE lubricant specialist certification and is a millwright and heavy-duty mechanic. He can be reached at texleug@shaw.ca.

MROMAGAZINE

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

5 Important Maintenance Metrics and How To Use Them

By  Bryan Christiansen,  Limble CMMS. Source : maintworld.com Effective maintenance of equipment is a critical factor in delivering quality operations that provide timely resources at a minimal cost. However, those in the maintenance field understand that equipment reliability does not come easy.  Organizations need to set quality benchmarks to measure the current effectiveness and predict future performance and use the data obtained to understand where to make improvements.   One way to do this is by using different maintenance metrics to understand the equipment performance. These metrics are very important as they can mean the difference between achieving the overall business goals and explaining how unexpected breakdowns caused yet another production delay.   Maintenance Metrics You Should Be Measuring What are the maintenance metrics? There are two categories of maintenance key performance indicators which include the leading and lagging indicators....

Why Pump Shafts Often Break at the Keyway Area

By NTS Pump shaft failure can lead to significant downtime and repair costs in industrial plants. One of the most common locations for pump shaft failure is at the keyway area. In this article, we will explore the reasons why pump shafts often break at the keyway and what can be done to prevent such failures. The keyway is a high-stress point (weakest point)  on the shaft, where a key is inserted to transmit torque between the shaft and the pump impeller or coupling. During operation, the keyway experiences cyclic loading that creates a bending moment in the shaft, which is concentrated in the keyway area. Over time, this cyclic loading can cause fatigue failure in the shaft material, leading to a fracture at the keyway. In addition to cyclic loading, other factors can contribute to shaft failure at the keyway. Improper keyway design or installation can lead to stress concentrations or inadequate clearance between the key and keyway . Misalignment or overloading can also cause ex...

Preventing Motor Bearing Damage from Shaft Current with the AEGIS® Ring

Electric motors are the workhorses of modern industry, powering everything from pumps and fans to conveyor belts and heavy machinery. But these vital components are not immune to wear and tear, and one common problem that can lead to premature motor failure is bearing damage caused by shaft current. Shaft current is a type of electrical discharge that occurs when there is a voltage potential between the motor shaft and the bearing, resulting in the flow of electrical current through the bearing. This current can cause a range of problems, including pitting and fluting of the bearing surfaces, which can lead to premature wear and failure. Shaft current Motor shaft current can have several harmful effects on bearings, including: 1.      Bearing pitting and fluting: Electrical discharges can cause tiny pits and flutes to form on the bearing surfaces, leading to premature wear and failure. 2.       Bearing noise and vibration: Shaft current can cause ...

WHAT IS THE ULTRASONIC IN-LINE INSPECTION (ILI) PIGGING?

In-line inspection (ILI) of pipelines has established itself as the most efficient tool for evaluating the condition of a pipeline and an indispensable part of pipeline integrity management. Historically, there have been two major technologies used in in-line inspection for corrosion, the magnetic flux leakage (MFL) and ultrasonics (UT), each having their distinct properties and fields of application.  Ultrasonic (UT) ILI has always provided unique quality of information about the pipelines, rendering highest accuracy and tightest measurement tolerances. In the 1990s ultrasonic tools for detection of cracks have become available. Ultrasonic measurement principle: ultrasonic transducer slides along the internal surface of the  pipe wall measuring distance to the wall and the wall thickness (top), yielding the stand-off and the wall  thickness (bottom two B-scans) Ultrasonic (UT) based In Line Inspection tools for all types of liquid filled pipelines. This includes Ultras...

Dry Gas Seal Failure Modes

BY BHUSHAN NIKAM. Invented in the mid-20th century and typically equipped in process gas centrifugal, dry gas screw compressors and expanders, dry gas seals (DGS) are the preferred gas lubricated dry seal solutions available on the market. They have become the standard for new machines. DGS are robust, simple, consume less power, and are more efficient in reducing leakage than their predecessor. Various configurations such as tandem with and without an intermediate labyrinth ( Figure 1 ), single ( Figure 2 ), and double ( Figure 3 ) are available & shall be selected based on process requirements. In this article, we discuss the various DGS failure modes and how they should be addressed:  PRESSURIZED HOLD/STANDBY Pressurized hold, also called settle-out condition, occurs when the compressor remains at a standstill, but the casing is pressurized. If an alternate process gas lacks sufficient pressure and flow, process gas enters the seal cavity through the process labyrinth ...